A sketch showing the supposed evolution of the horse has
appeared in nearly every textbook dealing with evolution. Typically, it
illustrates a transition from Eohippus (size of a
small dog, four toes
on the front foot and three on the rear, possessing browsing teeth and found in
Eocene strata) to Mesohippus (a slightly larger
browser, three toes on
the front, found primarily in Oligocene strata) to Merychippus
(larger
still, three toed but with grazing teeth, found in Miocene strata) to Pliohippus
(pony sized, still with three toes and grazing teeth, found
throughout the
Pliocene) to modern Equus, or horse (with one toe, front and back, and
with
grazing teeth). Unfortunately, this presentation does not contain the
whole
truth.
In modem decades, the tree of horse evolution has
been
refuted and abandoned, in professional circles at least. Consider this
admission by Steven Stanley: "The
horse ... the classic story of one genus
fuming into another, … Now it's becoming apparent that
there's an overlap of
these genera, and that there were many species belonging to each one"
(Bioscience, Dec. 1986). Mr. Walt Barnhart, in his master's thesis
(1987) at
ICR, catalogued this overlap in 21 different genera with data from the
evolutionary literature. Dotted lines represent uncertainties in
dating. Most
individual categories are known only from their teeth. It is hard to
see any
evolutionary sequence here.
A
significant problem surfaced when Lou Sunderland observed
(in Darwin's
Enigma) that
mounted specimens in the American Museum of
Natural History showed an irregularity of rib pairs. Eohippus
had 18
pairs, Orohippus had 15 pairs, Pliohippus
jumped to 19 pairs, and
the modern horse had 18. Some series!
Furthermore, the Eohippus, more
properly named Hyracotherium, is remarkably similar to the modern hyrax, a rock
badger. The San Diego Zoo
keeps a colony, where a sign identifies them as similar to the animal,
which
evolved into the horse and elephant. Others propose a hyrax-like ancestor for
the sea cow also. Quite a family tree.
Dr.
Duane Gish has observed (Evolution: The Challenge of
the Fossil Record) that during the time
when four toes were
supposedly evolving into one in North America, in South America a
one-toed
ungulate (a horse-like browser) was evolving into a three-toed
descendant.
Evolution theory, being as plastic as it is, can accommodate almost any
series
of fossils, and tell a good evolutionary "just so" story about how it
all happened.
A better understanding of the fossil data would be
to
consider the 21 genera in Barnhart's chart as belonging to three
created kinds.
Each category is quite different, and there are no
transitional forms
between them. The evidence is quite compatible with the true history we
read in
Genesis.
* Dr.
John Morris is the President of the
Institute for Creation Research.
Photo credits: Three horses image, Rebekah L. Holt, eQuest Photography Horse evolution graphic, www.dinosaursinthebible.com Rock Hyrax, George
M. Stolz, US Fish and Wildlife
Morris,
J. 1994. What About the Horse Series? Acts &
Facts. 23 (3). Copyright © 1994 Institute for
Creation Research, www.icr.org. Republished by permission.
ICR articles on
related topics:
“The Mythical Horse Series” by Dr.
John
Morris.
“Miniature Horse Poised to Break
Record”
by Brian Thomas.
“Donkey Gives Birth to a Zedonk” by
Brian
Thomas.
“The Palm Sunday Colt” by Dr. John
Morris.
Next Page
HOME EQUINE
ORIGINS
EQUINE BIBLE REFERENCES
EQUUS IN THE BIBLE EQUEST 4 KIDS
QUEST FOR CHRIST
STATEMENT OF BELIEF ABOUT
US CONTACT US
Equest For Truth © Copyright 2006-2011, All
Rights Reserved
Webdesign, Photography, and Graphics by Rebekah L. Holt unless otherwise
noted
|